It seemed like we spent 2 hours watching people die, the lone ranger not kill the villian, for no reason until the last 20 minutes.Īlso the villians kill people without mercy, yet when in contact with main characters, they just talk. Then the length was horrible for how little the plot mattered. the lone ranger is supposed to be badass, but no, he is a bumbling idiot who fucks over a lot of people. Serious, serious tone issues, like what the fuck was it trying to be? Also the lone ranger was made to be a coward who could've taken down the villain at the very beggining. You would literally have innocent people murdered on screen and the next scene would shift back to the horrible kid actor. Why should I like something that even the creators weren't interested in?
#The lone ranger netflix movie
But still, the movie should make a good argument as to why I should like the Lone Ranger, rather than giving me good reasons why he'll never be relevant again. Do I like the Lone Ranger? No, I'm 23! I was born decades after the Lone Ranger could hope to be relevant to anybody. If I can't feel passion for the project, I cannot like the movie. When the idea of a Lone Ranger movie embarrasses you, Verbinski, Disney, Johnny Depp, whoever, why did you even make a Lone Ranger movie? I got no sense at all that Lone Ranger was made by people who wanted to make a movie, rather it felt like people going through the motions trying to make another Pirates movie in a Cowboy hat. He says his classic line and the movie sulks, embarrassed that it has to be a Lone Ranger movie. Every time the Lone Ranger is about to do something Lone Ranger-y he has to be knocked down. What I cannot stand though, is when an adaptation feels like it is made by people who did not even like the source material. I'm not professional, but that doesn't matter if you consider all opinions to be valid.)Īnyway, I'm fine with an adaptation taking a new perspective on source material. (I am a critic, I reviewed Lone Ranger back in 2013. The framing device was absolutely shit and it takes half the movie before The Lone Ranger starts actually Rangering, but if you ignore the chunks that make up the worst half of the film you get an hour or so of good film-making and some clever action sequences (although the forced drama of murdering a bunch of Native Americans who made a blind charge to the death was one of many problematic issues with race in the film).īetween the two of them you have John Carter, a complete mess of a movie with a few good moments, and The Lone Ranger, a tedious slog that takes forever to eventually earn your excitement but is still pretty damn racist either way you look at it. Lone Ranger: Surprisingly, I enjoyed it overall, just not that much. While I liked his interactions with the Green Martians and the dog, nothing involving Red or White Martians did anything but bore me to tears and it turns out this is the most important part of the movie. There's some really forced emotional thread with his dead family and they highlight it in contrast with him slaughtering a bunch of Green Martians, but the intercutting of the battle with him burying his family members makes no damn sense and just made me laugh at the most important emotional scene. John Carter: John Carter has no chemistry with the Princess of Mars, so that entire romantic subplot falls apart.
0 kommentar(er)
